HKAIFA-R013
Find the conflict outsiders miss.
Enter a workplace with permission and interview frontline staff and decision-makers. Locate conflict in actual processes, responsibilities and unwritten rules.
What we will make
A four-minute workplace story, a fact-check register, anonymised interview notes and a statement of professional perspective.
How we will evaluate it
Two practitioners check workplace logic while non-specialist viewers explain the dilemma. Revise sensitive details without distorting the underlying facts.
3 days × 2 blocks · 30 days total
Proposed guest: Jia Zhangke
$3,200
Apply to joinCourse programme
Beijing · 2026-11-11T02:00:00.000Z – 2026-12-10T09:00:00.000Z · Asia/Shanghai
Who this is for
Documentary and fiction creators, practitioners, researchers and relevant community members. Choose one accountable role in the team; previous work or a short preparation task helps the lead organise complementary working groups.
Before you begin
Bring a one-page statement of the problem, one relevant experience or work sample, and materials you have permission to use. Review the preparation brief in your workspace before the first session. The course lead coordinates roles, interviews and external reviews; permission is required before using a contributor’s material or publishing their information. You will work towards: A four-minute workplace story, a fact-check register, anonymised interview notes and a statement of professional perspective.
The city as a research setting
Beijing is a setting for collaboration with writers, researchers and film production practitioners. The host city is the working base; market-specific interviews and reviews involve people from the named target market, in person or remotely. Enter a workplace with permission and interview frontline staff and decision-makers. Locate conflict in actual processes, responsibilities and unwritten rules.
1. Establish the lived problem
Enter a workplace with permission and interview frontline staff and decision-makers. Locate conflict in actual processes, responsibilities and unwritten rules.
What you submit: A one-page agreed brief, source and permission register, participant roles and the questions the first version must answer.
2. Test consequential choices
Develop two contrasting treatments of the same problem. Rehearse, storyboard or assemble only the decisive scene; review it with the relevant contributor before extending production. Two practitioners check workplace logic while non-specialist viewers explain the dilemma. Revise sensitive details without distorting the underlying facts.
What you submit: Two reviewable alternatives, notes on their effects and a reasoned creative decision attributed to its author.
3. Make the agreed work
Produce and assemble the work in assigned roles. Keep sources, permissions and actual resource use with the files. A four-minute workplace story, a fact-check register, anonymised interview notes and a statement of professional perspective. Coaching addresses the next creative decision; tools are introduced only as needed for that delivery.
What you submit: A four-minute workplace story, a fact-check register, anonymised interview notes and a statement of professional perspective.
4. Review, revise and hand over
Two practitioners check workplace logic while non-specialist viewers explain the dilemma. Revise sensitive details without distorting the underlying facts. Complete the final revision and handover by the last scheduled day. Separate observed responses from assumptions and unresolved questions.
What you submit: The final authorised work, external review notes, revision decisions, a resource ledger and a signed account of each participant’s actual contribution.
Completion requirements
Complete all four evidence packages, an individual decision log and the final review. Attend at least 80% of collective sessions, or agree an equivalent contribution within the course period. Reviewers record whether the agreed brief was delivered, what each person actually contributed and which issues remain unresolved. Artistic disagreement is documented rather than converted into a single taste score. Participation and verified completion are distinct records; commercial results are recorded only when evidenced.
Your verified experience record
Your record identifies the course, dates, role, verified contribution and assessment outcome. It links to permitted evidence and names the issuing Academy. Issued records include the signed payload hash and stored issuance timestamp. Public visibility follows your consent and the project’s permissions. INDEX association is made only after a work has a valid INDEX record; taking a course does not itself issue an INDEX certification.