HKAIFA-R025

An original character for Japan or Korea.

Choose Japan or Korea. With a local editor, study obligation, silence and boundary-crossing in one relationship, then rewrite two scenes for the same original character.

What we will make

Two two-minute character scenes, local editorial feedback and a statement of cultural context and originality.

How we will evaluate it

Local viewers understand what is at stake without the character depending on imitation of an existing property’s look or voice.

3 days × 2 blocks · 30 days total

Proposed guest: Hirokazu Kore-eda

$3,200

Apply to join

Course programme

Hangzhou · 2026-11-11T02:00:00.000Z – 2026-12-10T09:00:00.000Z · Asia/Shanghai

Who this is for

Authors, local editors, community organisers and creators familiar with the intended audience. Choose one accountable role in the team; previous work or a short preparation task helps the lead organise complementary working groups.

Before you begin

Bring a one-page statement of the problem, one relevant experience or work sample, and materials you have permission to use. Review the preparation brief in your workspace before the first session. The course lead coordinates roles, interviews and external reviews; permission is required before using a contributor’s material or publishing their information. You will work towards: Two two-minute character scenes, local editorial feedback and a statement of cultural context and originality.

The city as a research setting

Hangzhou offers a setting for small-business stories, creative production and research exchange. The host city is the working base; market-specific interviews and reviews involve people from the named target market, in person or remotely. Choose Japan or Korea. With a local editor, study obligation, silence and boundary-crossing in one relationship, then rewrite two scenes for the same original character.

1. Establish the lived problem

Choose Japan or Korea. With a local editor, study obligation, silence and boundary-crossing in one relationship, then rewrite two scenes for the same original character.

What you submit: A one-page agreed brief, source and permission register, participant roles and the questions the first version must answer.

2. Test consequential choices

Develop two contrasting treatments of the same problem. Rehearse, storyboard or assemble only the decisive scene; review it with the relevant contributor before extending production. Local viewers understand what is at stake without the character depending on imitation of an existing property’s look or voice.

What you submit: Two reviewable alternatives, notes on their effects and a reasoned creative decision attributed to its author.

3. Make the agreed work

Produce and assemble the work in assigned roles. Keep sources, permissions and actual resource use with the files. Two two-minute character scenes, local editorial feedback and a statement of cultural context and originality. Coaching addresses the next creative decision; tools are introduced only as needed for that delivery.

What you submit: Two two-minute character scenes, local editorial feedback and a statement of cultural context and originality.

4. Review, revise and hand over

Local viewers understand what is at stake without the character depending on imitation of an existing property’s look or voice. Complete the final revision and handover by the last scheduled day. Separate observed responses from assumptions and unresolved questions.

What you submit: The final authorised work, external review notes, revision decisions, a resource ledger and a signed account of each participant’s actual contribution.

Completion requirements

Complete all four evidence packages, an individual decision log and the final review. Attend at least 80% of collective sessions, or agree an equivalent contribution within the course period. Reviewers record whether the agreed brief was delivered, what each person actually contributed and which issues remain unresolved. Artistic disagreement is documented rather than converted into a single taste score. Participation and verified completion are distinct records; commercial results are recorded only when evidenced.

Your verified experience record

Your record identifies the course, dates, role, verified contribution and assessment outcome. It links to permitted evidence and names the issuing Academy. Issued records include the signed payload hash and stored issuance timestamp. Public visibility follows your consent and the project’s permissions. INDEX association is made only after a work has a valid INDEX record; taking a course does not itself issue an INDEX certification.